Tuesday, August 15, 2017
Throughout all our lives, there comes a defining moment where we must decide what our calling in life is. Those in the healthcare industry generally aim to serve those in need. Why is this? I like to think every one of us desires to serve some greater good. From an anthropological standpoint, humans have had somewhat of a natural inclination to help those in need. Regardless of our ethical and moral views, we as humans take care of someone in our lives. This can be our parents, children, friends, or from a healthcare setting, patients.
While taking the Leadership in Healthcare Administration course, we were required to listen to a podcast for one of our assignments. The title of the podcast was, "Erie Chapman - Bettering Healthcare with a Servants Heart." As I began to listen to the podcast, I was struck with somewhat of an epiphany. All of us in healthcare are servants. No matter what job title you obtain, you are a leader and servant to someone in need.
Knowing we are leaders and servants is a humbling, but exciting thing. As a future leader in healthcare administration, I always want to have the reason for my hope held tight to me. Our calling in life is ultimately serve daily for the betterment of others in need. THIS is why we work in a healthcare industry. If it is not, then maybe we should have some self reflection.
How is servant leadership effective? This question strikes and provokes my mind very often. Servant leadership reminds us daily of why we are involved in healthcare. It reminds the nurse every day of why she cares for the sick and dying. It reminds the surgeon of why he saves a dying child's life. It reminds the hospital manager of why he makes sure patients and caregivers are taken care of, and lastly, it reminds me of why I chose Saint Joseph's for graduate school.
Written by Cameron Davis, Graduate student at Saint Joseph's College
Monday, July 24, 2017
Healthcare is a highly regulated and in some cases, a highly competitive environment. Healthcare delivery is changing at a rapid pace. Healthcare leaders are learning how to adapt and lead their hospitals into the future. The center for Medicare services over the last few years adapted the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems; better known as HCAPHS patient satisfaction scores to tie patient satisfaction in the calculation of reimbursement for patient stays (CMS, 2015).
Hospitals in competitive environments focus on how to deliver care and stand out from the competition. Additionally, social media has changed how patients share their healthcare experiences. Patients can praise or complain about their hospital experiences on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and the like.
Leaders are in a great position to help staff understand the importance of patient experience to an organization, whether it be to improve overall scores or patient perception. Quality care is increasingly linked to efficiency, cost reduction and optimal utilization of resources. Healthcare quality care programs and metrics are increasingly influenced by financial incentives and measured by state of the art scientific tools and sophisticated methodologies. (Belasen, Eisenberg & Huppertz, 2016 p 144)
Patients and families view their experience of care in its entirety: The clinical treatment, the interactions with staff, and the physical and ambient environment all tie together as one, overall impression and journey. Leaders and caregivers who commit to observing and learning in detail about this journey quickly identify what needs to improve to create a better experience. (IHI, 2011)
How can you as a leader showcase the importance of patient experience in your workplace? Interpersonal relationships can go a long way to helping organizations improve scores. Effective leaders practice with conviction, and demonstrate the importance of the caregiver/patient relationship.
An important leadership quality is social intelligence. “Socially intelligent leaders have strong conversation and listening skills, a keen understanding of social roles and rules, confidence in interacting with different types of people and a fine-tuned ability to understand other’s thoughts and feelings.” (Sowick et al, 2015) One of my favorite quotes is from Maya Angelou “I have learned that people will forget what you said, people will forget what you did, but people will never forget how you made them feel.” This statement holds true not only to the patient’s we serve but also how we as leaders serve our teams.
Leaders of today must use both transactional leadership skills and transformational leadership skills to be an effective leader in today’s workplace. Being the vison setter to bring new ideas forward, to have the courage to lead by example and advocate for employees and patients will go a long way toward improving not only the patient but staff experience.
Balik, B. (2011, July). Institute for Healthcare improvement, Patient Safety Reprinted from ACHE.org
Belasen, A. T., Eisenberg, B, Huppertz, J. W., (2016). Mastering Leadership: A Vital Resource for Health Care Organizations, pgs.
Sowick, M, Andenoro, A, McNutt, M, Murphy, S.E (2015) Leadership 2050: Critical Challenges, Key Contexts, and Emerging Trends; Emerald Group
Provided by Robyn McDevitt, Graduate Student, Saint Joseph's College
Tuesday, July 18, 2017
Lately, I pondered the question of “….how would the retiring Boomer Long-Term Post-Acute Care (LTPAC) leaders be replaced….?" With the average age of administrator’s being in their 50’s, this is a real challenge for licensure boards, employers and educators. Public policy makers will need to find some solutions to this complex problem.
I had the opportunity to work with a number of students who are majoring in healthcare administration and are going out on a one-year practicum. I found them to be a delight to teach, but also to learn from. They are bright, focused, passionate about the LTPAC sector and were excited to learn about the profession.
It was enlightening and heartening to interact with this group, as they progressed in their studies. They asked great questions, researched many of the challenges facing our sector, and suggested innovative methods to approach some of the difficult issues facing the LTPAC sector.
What has been encouraging to me was that the students were from the millennial generation and very interested in an aging services career! There have been some articles and suggestions about the characteristics of this coming generation that were considered to be negative, when compared to Boomers. I did not find the “generalities” about millennials that have been suggested to be true nor accurate. They were serious with their studies, willing to learn, and excited about working in the sector.
It gave me considerable comfort that these students will make great leaders in the LTPAC sector. Now the question is how do we find more of the millennials that will be willing to prepare to learn and enter this profession?
Submitted by Steven Chies, Faculty at Saint Joseph's College
Friday, July 07, 2017
The Medicare Outpatient Observation Notice (MOON) came out earlier this year and this is something that always comes up as a question and not many know where to find the answers.
Medicare put out a MLN article in February for Critical Access Hospitals (CAHs) that provide observation services to Medicare Beneficiaries. The main point of this article was to identify and drive home a clear and concise message covering how providers in CAH facilities should utilize the MOON to educate Medicare beneficiaries. CAH providers should use the MOON to inform any Medicare beneficiary who is an outpatient in their facility that happens to be receiving observation services and are not an inpatient in the CAH or hospital.
Hospitals and CAHs must provide the MOON to beneficiaries who receive observation services in a CAH or hospital for more than 24 hours. This form must be provided to the Medicare beneficiary no later than 36 hours after observation services begin in the outpatient setting. Now, this is not only for the traditional Medicare Part A and Part B patient, but those beneficiaries that do not have Part B coverage, as this is optional, and when a patient is admitted prior to the required delivery of the MOON.
Now, one may think, let’s give these to all of our Medicare patients receiving outpatient services. This will not work as the MOON should not go to all beneficiaries receiving outpatient services. It is intended only for patients that exceed 24 hours of observation services. But here is a good twist, the CAH or hospital can deliver the MOON to Medicare beneficiaries that are receiving observation services in a CAH or hospital, but have not exceeded the 24 hour rule. As long as they are receiving observation services the CAH or hospital can deliver the MOON to the patient, but no later than 36 hours after observation services have started.
Some other points:
- The MOON must remain two pages
- Additional information may be attached, per individual state regulations
- Hospitals and CAHs can put their logo on the top of the MOON
- In completing the MOON, hospitals or CAHs must type or write (clearly) the patient name, patient number, and reason for outpatient in the blanks of the MOON.
- CAHs and hospitals must provide, not only the written MOON, but an oral notification as well. This must consist of an explanation of the standard written MOON.
- To show proof of delivery, the patient or representative must sign and date the MOON to show delivery and understanding of the information contained in the form.
- An electronic form of the MOON is permitted with an electronic signature capture pad.
- With an electronic form of the MOON, the patient must receive a paper copy as well.
Submitted by Kevin Harrington, MS, RHIA, CHP, Faculty, Saint Joseph's College
Wednesday, June 07, 2017
Alternative Payment Models (APMs) is an approach that was developed in partnership with the clinician community and it provides added incentives for clinicians to provide high-quality and cost-effective care. The APM can apply to a specific condition or a specific episode of care, or a population. APMs can offer significant opportunities to eligible clinicians who are not ready to take on the additional risk and requirements of Advanced APMs.
Advanced Alternative Payment Models (Advanced APMs) enable clinicians and practices to earn greater rewards for taking on some risk related to the patients that they serve and their associated outcomes. It is important to mention that the Quality Payment Program does not change the design of any particular APM, however, it can create extra incentives for an ample degree of participation in Advanced APMs. There are six models for APMs and they are Comprehensive End Stage Renal Disease Care Model, Comprehensive Primary Care Plus (CPC+), Shared Savings Program Track 2, Shared Savings Program Track 3, Next Generation ACO Model, and the Oncology Care Model. The listing of Advanced APMs are posted on the CMS website at QPP.CMS.GOV and will be updated as needed.
To help identify future opportunities, MACRA established the Physician-Focused Payment Model Technical Advisory Committee (PTAC) to review and assess Physician-Focused Payment Models based on proposals submitted by stakeholders to the committee. In future performance years, we anticipate that the following models will be Advanced APMs such as Comprehensive Care Joint Replacement Payment Model, Advancing Care Coordination through Episode Payment Models Track 1, ACO Track 1+, New Voluntary Bundled Payment Model, and the Vermont Medicare ACO Initiative.
Submitted by Kevin Harrington, MHSA, RHIA, CHIP, Full-Time Faculty Member at Saint Joseph's College
Thursday, May 18, 2017
When the Affordable Care Act was passed in 2010, it was met with two completely different reactions. Some viewed it as a mandate, while others viewed it as a right. In a sense, the law mandated that all United States citizens carry health insurance while also propagating that all United States citizens have a right to affordable access to health care. Not everyone agrees with either of these proponents, which has made for interesting conversations over the past year. One of those conversations focuses on patient rights – specifically how much we deserve.
If you have not read the Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks, I highly suggest that you do so. Or, if you prefer to watch TV, you can watch the TV version that was just released. Either way, it is a very interesting story. Henrietta passed away from cancer, but before she died, a sample of her cancer cells were used to create the HeLa chain – a chain of cells that proved to be very helpful to scientists. These scientists eventually benefitted financially from their research (involving Henrietta’s cells), but neither Henrietta nor her living relatives received any compensation for the cells or research finds.
Is this unusual? Not really. Henrietta’s cells were unusual, yes, and very helpful to scientists, but we do not usually benefit from body parts that are donated in our country. The law states that once a blood or tissue sample taken from a patient leaves the room that the patient occupies, it becomes property of the healthcare facility. The healthcare facility is then free to use it for purposes beyond the tests that have been ordered. In Henrietta’s case, the cells were found to be very helpful to scientists. But, without the scientist’s expertise, the cells would have simply sat in a petri dish or been discarded.
Some may argue that Henrietta did not consent for her cells to be used for research. The law is also clear on that issue – patients have the right to consent to or refuse research. However, the research was conducted after Henrietta’s cells were removed from her presence. It’s actually quite remarkable that her family members learned about the research – most of us never know what happens to that blood or tissue sample after we rececive our test results.
It really boils down to “what do we deserve”? Should Henrietta’s family be compensated for the use of her cells? Or should the compensation stay with the scientists who used their knowledge to further research surrounding cancer and cancer treatments? A lawsuit will be looking at that issue later this year. If the courts rule in favor of Henrietta’s family, we might be looking at another dynamic change in our country.
For more information:
Submitted by Valerie Connor, M.A., CCC-SLP, Adjunct Faculty at Saint Joseph's College.
Friday, April 28, 2017
When June became aware her growing impatience with her staff was a result from trying to solve a problem that was not a problem to solve but a polarity to leverage, her capacity to be an effective leader increased.
Healthcare leaders are master problem solvers. There are many situations and issues that daily require problem solving skills and decision making. For example, do we need a policy for xyz? Who should we have complete the survey? And, Should Mary be promoted to nurse manager? Problems to solve have end points. They are not ongoing. They have mutually exclusive opposites. Problems to solve require Or thinking.
Polarities require Both/And thinking. Both sides of the polarity are important. There is a natural tension in polarities and the oscillation between both sides is ongoing. Other realities about polarities include:
· Polarities are inherently unsolvable in that you cannot choose one pole of the pair as a “solution” to the neglect of the other pole and be successful over time.
· If you treat a polarity as if it were a problem to solve, the natural tension between the poles becomes a negative, self-re-enforcing loop or “vicious cycle” leading to unnecessary dysfunction, pain and suffering.
· If you can see a polarity within an issue, you can leverage the natural tension between the poles so it becomes a positive, self-re-enforcing loop or “virtuous cycle” lifting you and your organization to goals unattainable with OR thinking alone.
· The natural tension within all polarities is often experienced as resistance. Polarity thinking helps us leverage the wisdom within this resistance. It helps us convert resistance to change into a resource for stability AND change.
· Polarity thinking helps us see ourselves and our world more completely thus increasing our capacity to love.
Dr. Barry Johnson www.polaritypartnerships.com
In addition to Task AND Relationship, other common leadership polarities include: Stability AND Change, Candor AND Diplomacy, Directive AND Participative, Collaborate AND Compete, and Conditional Respect AND Unconditional Respect.
What can we do when we experience the tensions and dilemmas of polarities? Dr. Barry Johnson created the Polarity Map™ and his team at Polarity Partnerships created the 5 Step S.M.A.L.L process to help leaders leverage polarities.
Seeing – Identify the tension and the two interdependent poles that when leveraged well will create a virtuous cycle toward a greater purpose.
Mapping – Determine the upsides (values) and downsides (fears) of both poles.
Assessing – Gather data to determine how well or how poorly we are leveraging the polarity.
Learning – Understand what we learn from the assessment.
Leveraging – Create action steps and early warning signs that provide us a path to navigate the energy of the polarity.
June’s map helped her organize the energy she was experiencing while feeling impatient with her staff and acknowledge the oscillation of energy needed in the polarity of Task AND Relationship to help her reach her greater purpose of being an effective and inspiring leader.
Polarity Thinking – Dr. Barry Johnson www.polaritypartnerships.com
Blog post submitted by: Danine Casper, MHA, St. Joseph’s Adjunct Faculty Member HA 511 Leadership in Health Administration. Danine is also a Leadership Coach and Consultant. www.aponicoaching.com and is completing the Polarity Mastery Program to be a licensed polarity consultant.
Tuesday, April 18, 2017
Healthcare leaders work in complex and continuously changing environments. The challenges in this environment require new levels of leadership effectiveness. Leaders who capitalize on complexity have the capacity to supplement Either/Or problem solving skills with Both/And thinking.
June’s story illustrates developing leadership effectiveness using a polarity lens.
Feeling the pressure to meet performance improvement goals, June noticed herself becoming increasingly impatient with her staff. She asked for help to ensure her staff implemented her well-developed strategy and completed their tasks. Before discussing this, June agreed to explore her experience of being impatient and the impact it was having on her and the team.
During our conversation, June became aware that her impatience was connected to her need to control the outcome of the project in order to be recognized for the achievement and avoid the embarrassment of failure. This awareness shifted June’s perspective from wanting to control the outcome to ensuring she was being an effective leader. We discussed this dilemma and tension using the lens of Polarity Thinking.
Polarities are “An interdependent pair of values or alternative points of view that appear different and unrelated, competitive, or even opposite, but in reality need each other over time to reach outcomes neither can reach alone.” (Wesorick, 2016 p.6) Polarity Thinking supplements Either/Or problem solving with Both/And thinking.
June was experiencing a common leadership polarity: Task AND Relationship. Task and relationship each have a pole in the polarity and each have important values and benefits. However, when one pole of a polarity is overemphasized to the neglect of the other pole, over time, the result will be to experience a negative, defeating energy; a vicious energy system leading toward a deeper fear. June realized her impatience was due to her overemphasis on task to the neglect of relationships driven by her fear of failure and letting her team down.
When we find ourselves in the energy of the downside of the pole we have overemphasized, we have a natural tendency to course correct. June acknowledged when she notices herself becoming impatient it is a warning sign for her to evaluate how she is leveraging Task AND Relationships and adjust her energy accordingly.
As June recognized the impact her overemphasis on task was having on her team, she described what she and her team were missing out on by not leveraging the value of relationships. When they trust and support one another, they know their achievement far exceeds what any one of them could accomplish alone. When both Task and Relationship are leveraged a virtuous energy system is created that leads to the teams greater purpose of creating a thriving workplace.
At the end of our conversation June shared she was grateful for her new awareness that being an effective leader required her to have the knowledge and skills for the tasks to be accomplished AND self-awareness to recognize when there is a problem to solve or a polarity to leverage.
Part 2 of this blog will explore problems to solve and polarities to leverage along with a Polarity Map® and Five-Step S.M.A.L.L process for individuals and teams to leverage polarities.
Wesorick, B. (2016) Polarity Thinking in Healthcare: The Missing Logic to Achieve Transformation, Amherst, MA: HRD Press Inc.
Polarity Thinking – Dr. Barry Johnson www.polaritypartnerships.com
Blog post submitted by: Danine Casper, MHA, St. Joseph’s Adjunct Faculty Member HA 511 Leadership in Health Administration. Danine is also a Leadership Coach and Consultant. www.aponicoaching.com
Thursday, April 13, 2017
For several decades, our society has known that Baby Boomers would re-define what it means to age. Some aspects of “conventional wisdom” are now being challenged. I’ve recently challenged some of my students in a gerontology class to think about their own retirement. Assuming they will retire at the age of 65, and their life expectancy will give them quite a few healthy years beyond that, what would they want to do? Asking this question of people in their 20’s and 30’s can yield interesting results.
In Long Term Care, we’re developing an appreciation that quality of life is just as important as quality of care. What makes life meaningful and purposeful? Upon admission, we ask residents about their past hobbies and interests in order to support those areas. Often, though, I’ve heard people mention an area of interest that they haven’t pursued. “I’ve always wanted to take up painting, photography, music, reading for pleasure, etc., but between work and raising a family, I’ve haven’t had time.” The so-called golden years may be a time to take up a new hobby, too. We’re dispelling the idea that seniors can’t learn new things.
Elderhostel is a well-known program of designing classes for seniors. Teaching methods may differ somewhat from classes designed for “typical” college students, and the topics may not be commonly taught on college campuses.
Gerontological research is now showing that the abilities to think, learn, create, and innovate do not necessarily diminish with aging. People are often required to use these skills during their careers and child-rearing years. Upon retirement, the demand to use such skills may diminish, but the cognitive ability does not. Certain disease processes, such as dementia, may impact these skills, but aging itself does not. How can a senior use and sharpen such abilities?
First, the effort must be intentional. Pursue a new area of interest. Take classes through your adult education program or online (such as a course from Saint Joseph’s College!). Persist in learning a new skill, even if you aren’t proficient at first. The repetition of learning something new and practicing that skill can help to develop new neural pathways in the brain.
Secondly, hone your problem-solving skills. Mathematical puzzles such as Sudoku, and language puzzles such as crosswords, can train new neural pathways while also accessing previously known knowledge. I enjoy trying to figure out a mystery “whodunit.”
Third, view your personal history as an asset. By participating in classes with students from other generations, for example, you can lend your voice of expertise while also learning the new perspectives of others. I always enjoy teaching a multi-generational class where a variety of ideas can be shared. I’ve taken classes with students who were much older than myself, and I’ve admired them and the experiences they have shared. This may be the time to write your memoirs, make a quilt related to your family, or record stories about your family’s history, which will serve to benefit future generations.
Fourth, view your history in new ways. Gerontologist Harvey Lehman conducted a study of creativity in aging. He found that many of the most renowned sculptures in the art world were crafted by older artists. They used their life experience artistically in their work. If you create art, dance, music, etc., does the art you create at an older age take on a different, more mature meaning than it did at a younger age? The question may, or may not, be your skill level, but more importantly, the perspective presented by a more mature artist. Reclaim a long-forgotten hobby and compare your work of today with your work from decades ago.
Fifth, consider spending time in charitable work. Many seniors are taking time for short-term mission trips where they can use their skills for the benefit of others. Other cultures need your expertise in medical care, teaching, agriculture, and developing businesses, for example. Even if you can’t afford to travel to exotic locations, there are areas in the United States that need you, and there are growing opportunities for using these skills online. Many people express that they intended to bless others through their charitable work, but they received blessings as well.
Sixth, even if your senior years are compromised by health issues, find a way to give to others. In my work as a nursing home administrator, I found that depression and discouragement can be improved by focusing on the needs of others, not ourselves. Can you write letters to soldiers, knit mittens for underprivileged children, tutor children in reading, send care packages to college students, or record your own books for the blind? One of our most fun annual events was Bowl for Kids’ Sake, a bowling tournament to raise money for the Big Brothers/Big Sisters organization. While the organization’s bowling tournament occurred at a bowling alley on a Saturday, our event was held on Friday on Wii. The organization brought our residents t-shirts, snacks, and prizes. One year the top fundraiser for the entire community was a nursing home resident! An important part of having purpose is the ability to give to others, to be a provider and not just a recipient.
Don’t let your assumptions define how you’ll spend your senior years. After all, this isn’t your grandmother’s retirement!
Submitted by Philip C. DuBois, CNHA, FACHCA, Program Manager, Long Term Care Administration, Saint Joseph's College
Thursday, March 30, 2017
I picked up a copy of Haider Warraich’s book Modern Death as soon as I saw it advertised. This is a topic that I find fascinating and Mr. Warraich’s book was billed as the “follow-up” to Atul Gawande’s Being Mortal, so I didn’t think twice about the impulse purchase. While reading the first few chapters, I was a little disappointed. Mr. Warraich wasn’t presenting anything that I hadn’t already read or taught about as a professor of health law and ethics. I didn’t make my first earmark until page 91, but shortly after had to be careful not to earmark every other page. I quickly decided that Mr. Warraich had written a text that should be read by everyone – not just people fascinated with the legal and ethical issues surrounding end of life.
Modern Death begins with an overview of issues surrounding death, including the legal definition of “death” and methods of sustaining life. Landmark cases are explained and a detailed history of the development of CPR is included. After building a firm foundation, Mr. Warraich delves into the issues he sees most often as a physician. That first earmark on page 91? It was for this quote: “The reason people increasingly don’t want CPR is not that they are afraid it will fail but that they are afraid it will only partially work. Patients are afraid that if CPR makes their heart start beating again their brain will have to pay a huge cost.” In a society that values independence and self-reliance, this is so very true. Most people would rather not continuing living if they have to live in a vegetative or severally impaired condition. What is life in today’s world if you cannot continue to do the daily activities that you love?
After an excellent ethical analysis of death and resuscitation efforts, Mr. Warraich considers deeply the role of religion in the dying process. He states: “Physicians very frequently find themselves in difficult situations with patients who have a strong faith, but rarely do they talk about religion and spirituality.” One study estimates that only 10% of physicians broach this difficult but important subject. This number is extremely low considering a study of cancer patients showing that patients provided with “spiritual care had a better quality of life prior to their deaths, were more likely to pass in hospice, and were less likely to receive aggressive and unnecessary care close to death” when compared to patients not provided spiritual intervention.
Modern Death also examines the role of physicians assisting care-givers and surrogate decision makers. He proffers that physicians are usually at the center of the decision-making process and they are often required to buffer the various opinions of family members and caregivers. In addition, he states that the burden placed on surrogate decision makers (aka health care proxies) is seriously overlooked.
The topics of euthanasia and physician assisted suicide are also touched on in Modern Death. Mr. Warraich offers his own personal perspective and thoughts regarding this controversial topic. He provides a unique perspective regarding the shift in opinion over centuries, not just decades.
I have added this book to my list of texts that every healthcare professional should consider reading. Additionally, I will be giving it to my parents. Per Mr. Warraich’s suggestion, I will instigate the talk that everyone avoids, but everyone should have before it is too late and we simply have to guess.
Submitted by Valerie J Connor, MA CCC-SLP; MS CHES