Monday, June 15, 2020

Telemedicine in Senior Living Centers


Telemedicine in Senior Living Centers 

Telemedicine is the practice of providing patient care remotely. This is typically done through phone consultation or video conferencing.  Numerous advances in technology allow telemedicine to be conducted following HIPPA guidelines.   Currently, many platforms are available.  These range from simple video-conferencing platforms to those that combine video-conferencing and remote monitoring technologies.  In addition to patient and provider uses, telemedicine is also being used to provide communication among providers at different levels of care, such as a PCP to a hospital or a specialist.  

This technology can bridge gaps in care for those patients in senior living communities.   Typically, these older adults seek care for illness and related medical concerns more often than seniors residing in their home settings. Research indicates that older adults use medical services four times more frequently than do younger adults. However, there are many barriers in obtaining this care.   One hurdle is the lack of same day appointments with primary care physicians (PCPs).  This may be the result of a shortage of PCPs and Geriatricians.   Another barrier is transportation.  Many of these adults do not drive and/or are not able to navigate the public transit system.  For some, the cost of public transit is prohibitive, while others may have impairments which prevent them from being able to use public transportation.  These may be cognitive or physical (Shah, McDermott, Gillespie, Philbrick and Nelson, 2013).  

High-intensity telemedicine is a way to provide older adults with the services they need in a timely manner.  These systems allow providers to perform complete exams remotely and have been successfully used for pediatric populations.  Telemedicine has proven to be a feasible, acceptable, and effective treatment option.  This approach has also been effective in nursing home situations (Shah, McDermott, Gillespie, Philbrick and Nelson, 2013). 

 Veterans Affairs / Oklahoma conducted an informative pilot study using high-intensity telemedicine with rural residents suffering complex medical histories and mental illness. The program allowed the VA to provide care to Veterans who would not have otherwise qualified for home-based care since they lived outside the service area.  Participants in this VA study showed improvements in physical strength, improvements in occupational therapy evaluations, improved social function, as well as increased compliance with their treatment plans. One participant showed marked improvement in his A1C measurements.  In addition, he reported feeling more accountable for his own care as a result of daily monitoring and data transmission. Findings also indicated decreased caregiver burnout.  Telemedicine not only provides opportunities for access to care, but it can also allow older adults more control in managing their own health (Sorocco, Qureshi, Bratkovich, Wingo, and Mason, 2013). 

Cost-Benefit

The average cost of a telemedicine visit is estimated to be $40 - $50 per visit, while the average cost of an office visit is about $136 - $176. Research indicates that the patient’s issue can be successfully treated via telehealth 83% of the time.  It is estimated that telemedicine visits save an average of $126 for commercial insurance carriers.  Interestingly, Medicare programs reimburse telehealth visits at the same rate as in-person visits, but have been shown to still provide a $45/visit saving for Medicare overall.  

Telemedicine also allows better access to care beyond traditional office hours.   For example, many practitioners offer this service on weekends and after hours.  It has also positively impacted the use of alternative sites of care.  One study indicated that for every 100 patients using telehealth:
      5.6% would have gone to an emergency room;
       45.85% would have visited urgent care;
       30.9% would have gone to their PCP office,
       5.4% would have visited other clinics,
        12.3% would have done nothing to treat their acute problem.

Using telehealth services instead of alternate care sites such as the ER and Urgent care has been shown to provide cost saving.  Estimated saving per visit by site, depending on type of insurance, include the following:
Site of Care                             Commercial                Medicare
ER                                            $1595                          $943
Urgent Care                               116                              98
PCP                                                98                              83
Other Clinics                                 57                              83

While “doing nothing” did not have an associated cost, it could lead to the subsequent need of reaching out to one of the alternative care sites as a result of a worsening condition.  Potentially, this could lead to needing a higher level of care or extended hospitalization.  (Yamamoto, 2014). 

Concluding Comments
Telemedicine visits remove many barriers to care, such as lack of transportation.  It also decreases Caregiver stress in trying to get patients to appointments.  Telemedicine may also improve overall care, especially when patients would otherwise seek care in emergency rooms or urgent care centers. Typically, emergency/urgent care providers do not have access to patients’ health histories, medications and baseline status (Shah, McDermott, Gillespie, Philbrick and Nelson, 2013). This could lead to inadvertently prescribing medications or treatment that may have an adverse effect on the patient.  

The initial cost of equipment and software is of concern and varies significantly depending upon what vendor is used.  However, studies suggest that start-up costs could be made up in four years of implementation.  There are also some administrative costs involved, such as program managers and schedulers.  Another concern, as noted in the VA study was lack of integration between the technology and the EMR.   However, it is becoming more common for telemedicine to be integrated into EMRs.

References
Shah, M. N., McDermott, R., Gillespie, S. M., Phillbrick, E. B., & Nelson, D. (2013). Potential of telemedicine to provide acute medical care for adults in senior living communities. Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, 20(2), 162-168. https//doi.org/10.111/acem.12075
Sorocco, K. H., Qureshi, S. M., Bratkovich, K. L., & Mason, P. J. (2013). Integrating care coordination home telehealth and home-based primary care in rural Oklahoma: A pilot study. Psychological Services, 10(3), 350-352. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032785
Yamamoto, D. H. (2014, December). Assessment of the feasibility and cost of replacing in-person care with acute care telehealth services.

About the Author

Chandra Garcia, RN, BSN, CEN is an Emergency Room nurse with 25 years’ nursing experience – 20 years of which were served in the ER.  Currently, she is Director of a Level 1 Trauma Center Emergency Department in Northern Virginia. In addition, she is completing her M.H.A. degree at Saint Joseph’s College / Maine.   

Monday, May 04, 2020

How U.S. Policies Aid in the Spread of Virulent Diseases within the Healthcare Setting


Pandemic Sick Leave:
How U.S. Policies Aid in the Spread of Virulent Diseases within the Healthcare Setting
J. Hunter Martinsky
Saint Joseph’s College of Maine


Introduction
            Currently, the U.S. does not guarantee paid sick leave for short or long-term illness.  It is one, of only three, modern economies where it is not nationally mandated (Kim, 2017).  This benefit has commonly been an agreement between employees and their company, along with serving as an incentive to attract new workers.  As most Americans continue sheltering in place because of COVID-19, there are others who continue to work due to the necessity of employment.  This can be a dangerous combination, especially with the ability of the virus to take multiple days to incubate and can initially present as mild symptoms (Klompas, 2020).  If these workers are unable to take the needed time off to slow the spread of a virus due to fears of losing a paycheck, then quarantines serve no purpose.  This is most important within the U.S. healthcare systems as workers are on the frontlines of the epidemic and have daily contact with those patients most susceptible to the virus.
Implications
            The issue at the present time is whether COVID-19 efforts would be improved if all Americans had access to paid sick leave.  As the U.S. has quickly begun to take the lead in global cases and deaths due to the virus, one outstanding conclusion to be made is whether it has to do with this near global benefit for workers (Renken & Wood, 2020).  Legislation entitled, Families First Coronavirus Response Act was created to help those employers offer paid sick leave to their employees but this response may be too little too late as it took effect on April 1st of 2020, well after the virus had taken a foothold within the country (Department of Labor, 2020).  Special efforts need to be made within healthcare systems to ensure that paid sick leave is always available not only during pandemics but to prevent spread of illnesses overall.  National attempts also must be made to guarantee this benefit for all workers in order to alleviate the U.S.’ overcrowded emergency rooms and lessen the costs of healthcare.  Without these endeavors, America will only continue its struggle with the spread of COVID-19 and similar respiratory illnesses.
Conclusion
            Overall, the research has shown that access to paid sick leave allows workers to take the time off needed during courses of influenza-like illnesses.  This can result in fewer workers getting sick as it mitigates the spread of the viruses (Kumar et al., 2013).  It also could prevent employees from practicing presenteeism as they work during their illness which results in inadequate productivity and potential financial loss (Allen et al., 2018).  While there is an upfront cost to this benefit being offered, the incentives provided are fully realized during courses of pandemics and even the seasonal epidemics (Gianino et al., 2019).  All of this translates into the healthcare systems as healthcare workers are often the guiltiest of presenteeism and increase the potential spread of these viruses to not only fellow employees but also potentially patients (Mitchell, & Vayalumkal, 2017).
            As this pandemic continues to run its course globally, the research and information collected will continue to be deciphered and explored to identify ways in which governments could have prevented its spread.  One aspect that will need to be investigated is the effect of the pandemic and its relation to paid sick leave.  This will include the rate of infections within specific organizations such as those with paid sick leave and those without.  Additionally, there will be a need to examine reinfection rates in countries with paid sick leave along with their ability to reduce the spread of the virus.  One positive aspect of this virus in this modern age is the treasure trove of research being collected which allows for countless research opportunities to decipher and explore for years to come.
The benefits of paid sick leave go beyond the workplace as its absence effects workers, their families, and impacts the healthcare system.  While initially paid sick leave was created as an added benefit to working for an employer, this research has shown that its availability makes it a necessity.  Previous research indicated that the U.S. healthcare system would be most prepared during a pandemic, but it has become quickly overwhelmed due to its spread (Nuclear Threat Initiative, 2019).  This may be the result of workers’ inability to stay home as they develop symptoms and continue passing the virus to more bystanders. The lack of guaranteed paid sick leave has been noted as a contributing factor in past pandemics.  (Zhai, Santibanez, Kahn, Black, & de Perio, 2018).   Other countries have already proven its usefulness in everyday life.  Furthermore, the impact of COVID-19 upon American society has demonstrated an urgent need to change our old standards and guarantee this benefit to all workers.  While this virus continues to ransack everyday life and impede normal businesses, it is clear that the world will never be the same after the virus has run its course.
About the Author
J. Hunter Martinsky, MT (AMT), is a Lead Laboratory Scientist at Parkview Randallia Hospital in Fort Wayne, Indiana.  He is also a 2020 Graduate of the M.H.A. program of Saint Joseph’s College of Maine and a baccalaureate graduate in Human Biology from Indiana University.     






References
Allen, D., Hines, E. W., Pazdernik, V., Konecny, L. T., & Breitenbach, E. (2018). Four-year review of presenteeism data among employees of a large United States health care system: a retrospective prevalence study. Human resources for health, 16(1), 59. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-018-0321-9
Department of Labor. (2020). Families First Coronavirus Response Act: Questions and Answers. Wage and Hour Division. Retrieved from https://www.dol.gov/agencies/whd/pandemic/ffcra-questions
Gianino, M. M., Politano, G., Scarmozzino, A., Stillo, M., Amprino, V., Di Carlo, S., Benso, A., & Zotti, C. M. (2019). Cost of Sickness Absenteeism during Seasonal Influenza Outbreaks of Medium Intensity among Health Care Workers. International journal of environmental research and public health, 16(5), 747. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16050747
Kim, D. (2017). Paid Sick Leave and Risks of All-Cause and Cause-Specific Mortality among Adult Workers in the USA. International journal of environmental research and public health, 14(10), 1247. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14101247
Klompas, M. (2020). Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): Protecting Hospitals From the Invisible. Ann Intern Med. 2020; [Epub ahead of print 11 March 2020]. doi: https://doi.org/10.7326/M20-0751
Kumar, S., Grefenstette, J. J., Galloway, D., Albert, S. M., & Burke, D. S. (2013). Policies to reduce influenza in the workplace: impact assessments using an agent-based model. American journal of public health, 103(8), 1406–1411. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2013.301269
Mitchell, K. J., & Vayalumkal, J. V. (2017). Sickness presenteeism: The prevalence of coming to work while ill among paediatric resident physicians in Canada. Paediatrics & child health, 22(2), 84–88. https://doi.org/10.1093/pch/pxx026
Nuclear Threat Initiative. (2019). GHS Index – Global Health Security Index – Building Collective Action and Accountability. Retrieved from https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=2ahUKEwiR4NnE_-_oAhVXg3IEHeBxBVUQFjAAegQIARAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ghsindex.org%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2019%2F10%2F2019-Global-Health-Security-Index.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1UEVvYg9Bybto0jTTs8-y3
Renken, E. & Wood, D. (2020). Tracking the Pandemic: How Quickly is the Coronavirus Spreading State by State?. NPR.Org. Retrieved from https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2020/03/16/816707182/map-tracking-the-spread-of-the-coronavirus-in-the-u-s
Zhai, Y., Santibanez, T. A., Kahn, K. E., Black, C. L., & de Perio, M. A. (2018). Paid sick leave benefits, influenza vaccination, and taking sick days due to influenza-like illness among U.S. workers. Vaccine, 36(48), 7316–7323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.10.039